In Unix, how do you remove everything in the current directory and below it?
But how do you delete everything in the current directory as well as every subdirectory below it and the contents of all of those subdirectories?
10 Answers 10
Practice safe computing. Simply go up one level in the hierarchy and don’t use a wildcard expression:
The two dashes — tell rm that is not a command-line option, even when it begins with a dash.
Because you are specifically matching a named directory and are thus less likely to delete something that you don’t intend to delete.
doesn’t it delete the directory itself too? You have to do mkdir
hmm. i thought he wanted to delete everything in the current directory, but not the directory itself. how do we do that?
Will delete all files/directories below the current one.
If you want to do the same with another directory whose name you have, you can just name that
If you want to remove not only the sub-directories and files of it, but also the directory itself, omit -mindepth 1 . Do it without the -delete to get a list of the things that will be removed.
I needed to delete all the files in sub-directories, but did not want to delete the sub-directories themselves. find
You need -mindepth 1 if you are specifying a directory ( find
I tried: find -mindepth 1 -delete but i got illegal option — m but it worked great when i removed the mindepth option find . -delete
and then hit ESC-*, and bash will expand the * to an explicit list of files and directories in the current working directory.
- I can review the list of files to delete before hitting ENTER.
- The command history will not contain «rm -rf *» with the wildcard intact, which might then be accidentally reused in the wrong place at the wrong time. Instead, the command history will have the actual file names in there.
- It has also become handy once or twice to answer «wait a second. which files did I just delete?». The file names are visible in the terminal scrollback buffer or the command history.
In fact, I like this so much that I’ve made it the default behavior for TAB with this line in .bashrc:
bind TAB:insert-completions Update: The . stands for current directory, but we cannot use this. The command seems to have explicit checks for . and .. . Use the wildcard globbing instead. But this can be risky.
A safer version IMO is to use:
(this prompts you for confirmation before deleting every file/directory.)
When doing things like this, I’ve found a quick ls -r . first lets you see what you are going to delete. Useful to give a quick idea that you aren’t going to delete the whole disk.
@Yen — because if you do it in the wrong place you can get disastrous results. Using a specific name in the wrong place can only go wrong if the same subdirectory happens to exist there.
It is correct that rm –rf . will remove everything in the current directly including any subdirectories and their content. The single dot ( . ) means the current directory. be carefull not to do rm -rf .. since the double dot ( .. ) means the previous directory.
This being said, if you are like me and have multiple terminal windows open at the same time, you’d better be safe and use rm -ir . Lets look at the command arguments to understand why.
First, if you look at the rm command man page ( man rm under most Unix) you notice that –r means «remove the contents of directories recursively». So, doing rm -r . alone would delete everything in the current directory and everything bellow it.
In rm –rf . the added -f means «ignore nonexistent files, never prompt». That command deletes all the files and directories in the current directory and never prompts you to confirm you really want to do that. -f is particularly dangerous if you run the command under a privilege user since you could delete the content of any directory without getting a chance to make sure that’s really what you want.
On the otherhand, in rm -ri . the -i that replaces the -f means «prompt before any removal». This means you’ll get a chance to say «oups! that’s not what I want» before rm goes happily delete all your files.
In my early sysadmin days I did an rm -rf / on a system while logged with full privileges (root). The result was two days passed a restoring the system from backups. That’s why I now employ rm -ri now.
How do I remove a directory and all its contents?
The following command will do it for you. Use caution though if this isn’t your intention as this also removes files in the directory and subdirectories.
«-f» is «—force» which overrides some sanity checks and prompting. A safer command to start with would be rm -r directoryname .
@JimParis I think the word «safer» is relative. Suppose you are writing a script to run on a remote computer. That script has a command which is supposed to remove a directory. Here, it would be «safer» to use rm -rf directoryname coz you wouldn’t want your script to pause execution, because it’s waiting for user input. Of course, you have to be sure that deleting the directory would do no harm.
if rm -rf directoryname fails you, try using rm -R -f directoryname , or rm —recursive -f directoryname .
If you are not having any luck with these, you should consider reinstalling rm or switching shells.
These were the options available on my rm man page, I looked it up by typing man rm to view my options on recursive deletion and the force options.
Does your rm man page list -r ? What does it do? (Try it in a directory that you create just for testing purposes, with only dummy files (and maybe subdirectories) in it.) What operating system are you using?
P.S. If rm -r doesn’t work, that would be an OS issue, not a shell issue. (Strictly speaking, it would be an issue with the version of rm that you’re using, so you could address it by installing a different version of rm , or searching your system to see whether you already have a different version of rm in some directory other than /bin .)
Ah, right. I forgot to mention I’m on Ubuntu 14.04 When I ran man rm in my terminal, it gave me a text file with the less text viewer. I scrolled found an indented entry with a whole that had the -R and —recursive options cozied up with the -r option, signifying that all of those arguments are identical.
edit: have you tried sudo rm -r directoryName ? The unwritten rules of the basic commands is that -r will allow a program to run recursively on every file your filesystem (starting where ever you choose!) and that -f will forcefully do things, even if it’s dangerous. ‘cd’, ‘mv’, ‘ls’ mostly holds this principle true. ls -r / is gonna be a duzie, and cp -rf / /dev/null will destroy everything on your filesystem.
Other answers show how to completely remove a directory’s content, but IMO they don’t address the literal question of the original post — that is, how can one delete subdirectories (as opposed to usual files). In other words, how can one delete empty directory structures while keeping subdirectories containing files ?
This can be achieved with find :
find directoryname -type d -delete This command will recursively search for directories ( -type d ) through directoryname and -delete them only if their subdirectories or themselves don’t contain any files.
How to delete a non-empty directory in Terminal?
I’m unable to remove a directory like «New Folder» using all the above detailed commands. It’s double worded. But I want to remove that directory. Any suggestions will be welcomed. T.Divakara, Bengaluru, India
Its the blank space in the file name, try using ‘quotes’ > rmdir ‘New Folder’ < then the folder disapers, or use escape characters for non-vissible characters.
4 Answers 4
Use the below command :
It deletes all files and folders contained in the lampp directory.
In case user doesn’t have the permission to delete the folder:
Add sudo at the beginning of the command :
Otherwise, without sudo you will be returned permission denied. And it’s a good practice to try not to use -f while deleting a directory:
Note: this is assuming you are already on the same level of the folder you want to delete in terminal, if not:
sudo rm -r /path/to/folderName FYI: you can use letters -f , -r , -v :
- -f = to ignore non-existent files, never prompt
- -r = to remove directories and their contents recursively
- -v = to explain what is being done
In my humble opinion, it’s a good practice never to add the «f» on first attempt. Its purpose is to ignore certain warning prompts that may be important, especially if you’ve accidentally done it on/from the wrong directory. In my opinion it’s good to try without the «f» first, then only if you are encountering a lot of warning prompts and you’re sure it’s OK to ignore them all, Ctrl+C out of it and repeat the command with the «f».
@thomasrutter . Agree. A file «xxx» owner: root and group: root can BE deleted with the -f switch; and without sudo. This is the message without -f: «rm: remove write-protected regular file ‘/home/william/.cache/netbeans/v08.01/tmp/xxx’? _». _Tread gently.
However, you need to be careful with a recursive command like this, as it’s easy to accidentally delete a lot more than you intended.
It is a good idea to always double-check which directory you’re in, and whether you typed the command correctly, before pressing Enter.
Safer version
Adding -i makes it a little safer, because it will prompt you on every deletion. However, if you are deleting many files this is not going to be very practical. Still, you can try this first.
Many people suggest using -f (combining it into -Rf or -rf ), claiming that it gets rid of annoying prompts. However, in normal cases you don’t need it, and using it suppresses some problems that you probably do want to know about. When you use it, you won’t be warned if your arguments supply a non-existing directory or file(s): rm will just silently fail to delete anything. As a general rule, try first without the -f : if there are problems with your arguments, then you’ll notice. If you start getting too many prompts about files without write access, then you can try it with -f . Alternatively, run the command from a user (or the superuser using sudo) that has full permissions to the files and directories you’re deleting to prevent these prompts in the first place.