Util linux arch linux

Arch Linux User Repository

This package should only be flagged out of date if there is a release of loop-aes which offers a new diff.

Latest Comments

commented on 2011-10-08 21:01 (UTC)

Hi Great package but small error on my end: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux/v2.19/util-linux-2.19.1.tar.bz2 404 Not Found Worked well first time but now I had to copy around some file’s good thing i don’t clean my ~/aur that often 😉 Also a suggestion: Adding a inithook to automate the kernel patch, mite save some work.

commented on 2011-05-19 03:22 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay; been away for a while. Updated to new version and no problems so far on my side. Changed to direct loop-AES diff file instead of downloading everything else—seems ok to me.

commented on 2011-05-14 07:25 (UTC)

2.19.1 is out since may, 2nd: check http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux/v2.19/v2.19.1-ReleaseNotes

commented on 2011-03-04 03:35 (UTC)

small update: after a brief discussion on the forums (in AUR section if you want to search) I decided it was enough to print a warning message for first time installs (e.g. post_install() but not post_upgrade()).

commented on 2011-03-03 23:33 (UTC)

not a problem, i appreciate your feedback. 2) you may be right. i’ll see what i can do and hopefully find a simple and non-intrusive way of dealing with this. may take a little thought preparation before i resubmit the package though.

commented on 2011-03-03 22:47 (UTC)

hey, glad u found my suggestions useful. 2) yeah, i mean something like that. u may be right that the user should know what to do. it’s up to u, i don’t know if there’s a package convention or something. if you decide not to follow the config options check, at least a disclaimer with a warning should be put, in my opinion, expecially the installation of this package will remove the stock util-linux. if im not wrong, if u install this package and kernel is not compiled correctly, and there’s not a patched loop.ko, system is going to be messed. another option would be to check for a patched loop.ko, but i dont know if this can be done since that is a binary.

commented on 2011-03-03 20:23 (UTC)

@gemon: 1) i’ll fix that, thanks. 2) you mean when checking the config to check for; [[ CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP == [YM] && CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP_AES == Y && CONFIG_MODULES == Y ]], or what? i’m not sure how important this is to deem necessary a PKGBUILD to check system files. i personally think it should be up to the user to know if their kernel is patched or not but that’s just my opinion. am i wrong in thinking this?

commented on 2011-03-03 17:27 (UTC)

milo, a couple of suggestions for the pkgbuild: 1) why dont u make the patch downloadable through the loop-aes website? 2) why dont u put a check on kernel config to stop building package if required config options are not set as they’re required by loopaes? regards gemon

commented on 2011-03-02 21:18 (UTC)

2.19 with loop-aes patch works for me but is considered [testing]. let me know if you have problems. util-linux-ng-aes 2.18 is still available in AUR (so far).

Copyright © 2004-2023 aurweb Development Team.

AUR packages are user produced content. Any use of the provided files is at your own risk.

Источник

Arch Linux User Repository

This package should only be flagged out of date if there is a release of loop-aes which offers a new diff.

Latest Comments

TrialnError commented on 2023-06-14 18:39 (UTC)

I’m not a fan of pkgrel bumps in favour of aur helpers. And not required to do so.
In general it could trigger/remind some of the needed rebuild. But for others it will be an unnecessary one as they covered it themselves. When someone uses software from the AUR he needs to look after it.

vaygr commented on 2023-06-11 20:52 (UTC)

TrialInError that’s fine, but it needs a rebuild against Python 3.11 so pkgrel could trigger it.

TrialnError commented on 2023-06-11 17:50 (UTC)

This package stays at 2.38 until the mess is resolved which got introduced with 2.39.

vaygr commented on 2022-10-15 19:43 (UTC)

I wonder if we could make asciidoctor optional since it’s required only for manual pages. On my system it requires a zoo of ruby dependencies which I’d like to avoid.

TrialnError commented on 2022-07-01 17:23 (UTC)

Hello vaygr.
Fair point you’re mentioning. Didn’t thought of those lines in loop-aes.
So let’s remove it from this and maybe change loop-aes such that the modules handling is moved to a separate file and more visible as such.
Thanks for the heads up

vaygr commented on 2022-06-20 00:03 (UTC)

TrialInError am I missing something or «util-linux-aes.modules» file should be dropped from here?

I think both loop-aes and loop-aes-dkms set up module loading properly and this one just duplicates what’s already there + leaves some old cruft that’s not relevant anymore:

systemd-modules-load[262]: Failed to find module 'aes-i586' 

TrialnError commented on 2021-06-21 16:13 (UTC)

Not the first to mention this 😀
Yes, I indeed overlooked this detail. I was under the impression the loop-aes files come with a sig. Well, apparantly not..

vaygr commented on 2021-06-21 15:17 (UTC)

TrialInError seems Jari’s key needs to be added to validpgpkeys for successful build.

Which is ’12D64C3ADCDA0AA427BDACDFF0733C808132F189′.

TrialnError commented on 2021-06-20 18:39 (UTC)

Sure thing, vaygr.
And thanks for getting into contact with upstream.

vaygr commented on 2021-06-20 16:50 (UTC)

TrialnError I reached out to Jari, and now the patch is there:

Could you please bump the package once again?

Copyright © 2004-2023 aurweb Development Team.

AUR packages are user produced content. Any use of the provided files is at your own risk.

Источник

DESCRIPTION

ul reads the named files (or standard input if none are given) and translates occurrences of underscores to the sequence which indicates underlining for the terminal in use, as specified by the environment variable TERM. The terminfo database is read to determine the appropriate sequences for underlining. If the terminal is incapable of underlining but is capable of a standout mode, then that is used instead. If the terminal can overstrike, or handles underlining automatically, ul degenerates to cat(1). If the terminal cannot underline, underlining is ignored.

OPTIONS

Underlining is indicated by a separate line containing appropriate dashes `-‘; this is useful when you want to look at the underlining which is present in an nroff output stream on a crt-terminal.

-t, -T, —terminal terminal

ENVIRONMENT

The following environment variable is used:

The TERM variable is used to relate a tty device with its device capability description (see terminfo(5)). TERM is set at login time, either by the default terminal type specified in /etc/ttys or as set during the login process by the user in their login file (see setenv(3)).

HISTORY

The ul command appeared in 3.0BSD.

BUGS

nroff usually outputs a series of backspaces and underlines intermixed with the text to indicate underlining. No attempt is made to optimize the backward motion.

SEE ALSO

REPORTING BUGS

AVAILABILITY

The ul command is part of the util-linux package which can be downloaded from Linux Kernel Archive https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux/.

Powered by archmanweb, using mandoc for the conversion of manual pages.

The website is available under the terms of the GPL-3.0 license, except for the contents of the manual pages, which have their own license specified in the corresponding Arch Linux package.

Источник