Which linux 128mb ram

Command Line Linux Distro for i386 and 128MB RAM

I’m looking for a command line Linux distro that runs under 128Mb of RAM and works with i386. All the distros that I’ve looked at so far seem to be too big, don’t support that old of a processor, or are GUI OSs. I’ve looked at Arch Linux, Tiny Core, Gentoo, SuSE JEOS, and Slitaz. It will be mostly used for running GCC, Mono, Wine, and such.

Take note that I ran GUI linux on a 80 MB 486 for several years. Debian 2.1, 2.2, 3.0. The trick is to use a lightweight window manager and no desktop manager. That won’t leave you a lot of room for wine, nor for a really new version of gcc (which can use a lot of space when trying hard to optimize things).

Are you actually planning on running with a 386 processor? These are really old chips, you will be much better off if you have a 486 at least.

4 Answers 4

I would use Damn Small Linux, Puppy Linux, or similar. I would avoid any of the more general-purpose distros like Arch or Gentoo, purely because they are bigger. Basically, you want the sort of distro that purposely doesn’t include many packages, so you’re forced on an individual basis to compile and install anything not essential to the core OS’s operation. That will help you keep control of the OS footprint, both in terms of RAM and disk.

Yes, both of my recommended choices include a GUI option. I think you should not use that as an immediate disqualifier, because with Linux, the GUI is always optional. If the installer doesn’t give the option of disabling it, it’s trivial to disable it after install: change the initdefault line in /etc/inittab to have a 2 or 3 in the second field. (The behavior difference between runlevel 2 and 3 varies depending on the Linux distro. Typically you get a GUI on boot only at level 5.)

Читайте также:  Win vst on linux

I’m also aware that the specs for these systems recommend a 486+ or more RAM. You can ignore this by choosing not to use all of the features available in the distro. You’ve already made a big leap in this direction by opting out of a GUI. Another big step is starting with a parsimonious distro in the first place.

Источник

Thread: Which Linux Distro is suitable for 128 MB RAM

anirudhtomer is offlineA Carafe of Ubuntu

SmileWhich Linux Distro is suitable for 128 MB RAM

I am trying to introduce Linux to 7th Grade kids in my society.
I have got some very very old PC’s with 128MB RAM and some with 256 MB RAM. The processor speed is 1GHZ to 1.5GHZ for most of them.
Please tell me which Linux Distribution will be suitable for it.
I want to install them on Hard Disk & rather than booting from the USB drives every time.

Stay Cool Stike Hard.
I love LINETAL (Linux + Networking + Heavy Metal)

Check out my blog on Systems Programming and more at http://systemsdaemon.blogspot.com

TNT1 is offlineDipped in Ubuntu

Re: Which Linux Distro is suitable for 128 MB RAM

I have antiX on a 64Mb RAM, PIII 900odd MHz dell laptop. Works like a bomb. ( I am getting more ram one day. )

Rubi1200 is offlineStaff Emeritus

Re: Which Linux Distro is suitable for 128 MB RAM

For the computers with 256MB RAM you might, I stress might, be able to get away with using Lubuntu.

philinux is offlineSound of Inevitability

Re: Which Linux Distro is suitable for 128 MB RAM

QuoteOriginally Posted by anirudhtomer View Post

I am trying to introduce Linux to 7th Grade kids in my society.
I have got some very very old PC’s with 128MB RAM and some with 256 MB RAM. The processor speed is 1GHZ to 1.5GHZ for most of them.
Please tell me which Linux Distribution will be suitable for it.
I want to install them on Hard Disk & rather than booting from the USB drives every time.

anirudhtomer is offlineA Carafe of Ubuntu

Re: Which Linux Distro is suitable for 128 MB RAM

I am going to use antiX. Linux Rocks. (Rather —it Metals)

Читайте также:  Темная тема kali linux

Stay Cool Stike Hard.
I love LINETAL (Linux + Networking + Heavy Metal)

Check out my blog on Systems Programming and more at http://systemsdaemon.blogspot.com

snowpine is offline

I Ubuntu, Therefore, I Am

Re: Which Linux Distro is suitable for 128 MB RAM

Also look into the Linux Terminal Server Project (LTSP). It allows you to run old computers as «thin clients» over the network. There are some incredible success stories of educators who have used it in schools.

AntiX is great too, so no argument from me there.

anticapitalista is offlineA Carafe of Ubuntu

Re: Which Linux Distro is suitable for 128 MB RAM

If you have any issues, questions regarding antiX just post at the antiX forum.

Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways — the point is to change it.

antiX «Edelwei�piraten» — lean and mean. http://antix.mepis.com

  • Site Areas
  • Settings
  • Private Messages
  • Subscriptions
  • Who’s Online
  • Search Forums
  • Forums Home
  • Forums
  • The Ubuntu Forum Community
    1. Ubuntu Official Flavours Support
      1. New to Ubuntu
      2. General Help
      3. Installation & Upgrades
      4. Hardware
      5. Desktop Environments
      6. Networking & Wireless
      7. Multimedia Software
    2. Ubuntu Specialised Support
      1. Ubuntu Development Version
      2. Security
      3. Virtualisation
      4. Ubuntu Servers, Cloud and Juju
        1. Server Platforms
        2. Ubuntu Cloud and Juju
      5. Gaming & Leisure
        1. Emulators
      6. Wine
      7. Development & Programming
        1. Packaging and Compiling Programs
        2. Development CD/DVD Image Testing
        3. Ubuntu Application Development
        4. Ubuntu Dev Link Forum
        5. Programming Talk
        6. Repositories & Backports
          1. Ubuntu Backports
            1. Bug Reports / Support
      8. System76 Support
      9. Apple Hardware Users
    3. Ubuntu Community Discussions
      1. Ubuntu, Linux and OS Chat
        1. Recurring Discussions
        2. Full Circle Magazine
      2. The Cafe
        1. Cafe Games
      3. Market
      4. Mobile Technology Discussions (CLOSED)
      5. Announcements & News
      6. Weekly Newsletter
      7. Membership Applications
      8. The Fridge Discussions
      9. Forum Council Agenda
      10. Forum Feedback & Help
        1. Request a LoCo forum
      11. Resolution Centre
    4. Other Discussion and Support
      1. Other OS Support and Projects
        1. Other Operating Systems
          1. Ubuntu/Debian BASED
          2. Debian
          3. MINT
          4. Arch and derivatives
          5. Fedora/RedHat and derivatives
          6. Mandriva/Mageia
          7. Slackware and derivatives
          8. openSUSE and SUSE Linux Enterprise
          9. Mac OSX
          10. PCLinuxOS
          11. Gentoo and derivatives
          12. Windows
          13. BSD
          14. Any Other OS
      2. Assistive Technology & Accessibility
      3. Art & Design
      4. Education & Science
      5. Documentation and Community Wiki Discussions
      6. Tutorials
        1. Outdated Tutorials & Tips
      7. Ubuntu Women
      8. Ubuntu LoCo Team Forums
        1. Americas LoCo Teams
          1. Argentina Team
            1. Software
            2. Hardware
            3. Comunidad
          2. Arizona Team — US
          3. Arkansas Team — US
          4. Brazil Team
          5. California Team — US
          6. Canada Team
          7. Centroamerica Team
          8. Chile Team
            1. Comunidad
            2. Hardware
            3. Software
            4. Instalaci�n y Actualizaci�n
          9. Colombia Team — Colombia
          10. Georgia Team — US
          11. Illinois Team
          12. Indiana — US
          13. Kentucky Team — US
          14. Maine Team — US
          15. Minnesota Team — US
          16. Mississippi Team — US
          17. Nebraska Team — US
          18. New Mexico Team — US
          19. New York — US
          20. North Carolina Team — US
          21. Ohio Team — US
          22. Oklahoma Team — US
          23. Oregon Team — US
          24. Pennsylvania Team — US
          25. Peru Team
          26. Texas Team — US
          27. Uruguay Team
          28. Utah Team — US
          29. Virginia Team — US
          30. West Virginia Team — US
        2. Asia and Oceania LoCo Teams
          1. Australia Team
          2. Bangladesh Team
          3. Hong Kong Team
          4. Myanmar Team
          5. Philippine Team
          6. Singapore Team
        3. Europe, Middle East, and African (EMEA) LoCo Teams
          1. Albania Team
          2. Catalan Team
          3. Portugal Team
          4. Egypt Team
          5. Georgia Team
          6. Ireland Team — Ireland
          7. Kenyan Team — Kenya
          8. Kurdish Team — Kurdistan
          9. Lebanon Team
          10. Morocco Team
          11. Saudi Arabia Team
          12. Sudan Team
          13. Tunisia Team
        4. Other Forums & Teams
        5. LoCo Archive
          1. Afghanistan Team
          2. Alabama Team — US
          3. Alaska Team — US
          4. Algerian Team
          5. Andhra Pradesh Team — India
          6. Austria Team
          7. Bangalore Team
          8. Bolivia Team
          9. Cameroon Team
          10. Colorado Team — US
          11. Connecticut Team
          12. Costa Rica Team
          13. Delhi Team
          14. Ecuador Team
          15. El Salvador Team
          16. Florida Team — US
          17. Galician LoCo Team
          18. Greek team
          19. Hawaii Team — US
          20. Honduras Team
          21. Idaho Team — US
          22. Iowa Team — US
          23. Jordan Team
          24. Kansas Team — US
          25. Libya Team
          26. Louisiana Team — US
          27. Maryland Team — US
          28. Massachusetts Team
          29. Michigan Team — US
          30. Missouri Team — US
          31. Montana Team — US
          32. Namibia Team
          33. Nevada Team — US
          34. New Hampshire Team — US
          35. New Jersey Team — US
          36. Northeastern Team — US
          37. Panama Team
          38. Paraguay Team
          39. Qatar Team
          40. Quebec Team
          41. Rhode Island Team — US
          42. Senegal Team
          43. South Carolina Team — US
          44. South Dakota Team — US
          45. Switzerland Team
          46. Tamil Team — India
          47. Tennessee Team — US
          48. Trinidad & Tobago Team
          49. Uganda Team
          50. United Kingdom Team
          51. US LoCo Teams
          52. Venezuela Team
          53. Wales Team
          54. Washington DC Team — US
          55. Washington State Team — US
          56. Wisconsin Team
          57. Yemen Team
          58. Za Team — South Africa
          59. Zimbabwe Team
Читайте также:  Linux линк на папку

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Источник

Оцените статью
Adblock
detector